As a RPA program advances from the pilot stage to a developing RPA program, a key choice will be required on the best way to staff each capacity. There are commonly three models that an office can use, the contractual worker, inward FTE, or half breed draws near. The table underneath gives a short portrayal of the upsides and downsides related with every one of the models. Until this point in time, most offices have embraced some type of the cross breed model with the harmony among contractual worker and interior FTE tipped by singular program business destinations and staff accessibility/appropriateness. The government RPA COP prescribes that offices think about this equalization, and resourcing technique cautiously. RPA computerizations speak to another advanced workforce and organizations ought to gauge the long haul effects of redistributing all improvement, the board, and control of “advanced representatives.” Note, as well, FTEs reskilled for RPA can emerge out of the specialty units, and not really IT. Settling on RPA assets can be troublesome. Temporary worker’s have quick advancement aptitude, experienced in process determination, speed to execute, recognition with numerous RPA merchant arrangements, and no institutional information picked up. Interior FTE have upskilling of current government representatives to high-esteem work, prompt comprehension of the inner business forms, Cost-successful methodology, simpler frameworks get to, constrained RPA experience, potential time delay for preparing. Above all, business process information and experience utilizing RPA, can alleviate framework get to issues, and can offset speed of usage with lower costs.